Conceptual map and reading comprehension in students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37711/desafios.2019.1.2.71Keywords:
understanding, group, elementary school student, satisfaction.Abstract
Objective. To improve reading comprehension with the implementation of conceptual maps in students of Educative Institution N° 32011 Hermilio Valdizan, Huanuco. Methods. Quasi-experimental design was used, after an intentional non-probability sampling was carried out in 33 students from 6th grade “C”, our experimental group. 34 students from 6th grade “A”, our control group. Results. Regarding the level of reading comprehension of students under study. In the experimental group, before the intervention, 66.7 % were in process, 30.3 % at the beginning and 3 % had a satisfactory level. After the intervention, 48.5 % were at the satisfactory level and in process, respectively, while 3 % at the beginning. On the other hand, in the control group, before the intervention, 50 % was in process, 29.4 % at the beginning and 20.6 % at a satisfactory level. After the intervention, 44.1 % of students are in process, 38.2 % at the beginning and 17.6 % at a satisfactory level. Making comparisons of reading comprehension scores between 6th grade “C” students, from the experimental group, and 6th grade “A” students, from control group, we found in the experimental group, an average of 12.8 and in control group, an average of 9.1. It was evident that students in the experimental group achieved better scores than those in the control group. Student’s T test was used, reaching the value of t = 4.58, p <= 0.000. Conclusion. There are statistically significant differences in the scores between the two groups. This is what indicates that the implementation of concept maps influences the increase in scores in reading comprehension, compared to the group that did not receive the intervention.
Downloads
References
Alonso, C., Gallego, D. y Honey, P. (1997). Los Estilos de Apren-dizaje. Bilbao, España: Ediciones Mensajero.
Alberto, L., Rojas, F. y Peinado, S. (2011). Influencia de los mapas conceptuales y los estilos de aprendizaje en la comprensión de la lectura. Revista estilos de Aprendizaje, 4(8), 3-22. Recuperado de http://revistaestilosdeaprendizaje.com/article/view/933
Almeyda, S. (2005). Estrategias metodológicas en la peda-gogía contemporánea. Lima, Perú: JC.Cassany, D. (2004). Las cuatro destrezas: Comprensión lectora. Barcelona, España. Recuperado de http://1314-procesos-infantil.weebly.com/uploads/9/6/4/6/9646574/las_cuatro_destrezas_comprensin_lectora
Díaz, J. (2002). Los mapas conceptuales como estrategia de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación básica - propuesta didáctica en construcción. Educere, 6 (18), 194-203. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/356/35601811.pdf
Eduteka. (2017). Mejorar la comprensión lectora. Eduteka. Bogota Colombia. Recuperado de http://eduteka.icesi.edu.co/proyectos.php/2/13753
Escobedo, F. (2014). Métodos y Técnicas del Estudio. Perú: Editorial JOALIS.Hernández, A. y Quintero, A. (2001). Comprensión y composición escrita. Madrid, España: Síntesis.
Márquez, A. (2017). Sobre lectura, hábito lector y sistema edu-cativo. Perfiles educativos, 39(155), 3-18. Recupera-do de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-26982017000100003&lng=es&tlng=es.
Ministerio de Educación. (2017). El Perú en PISA 2015. Informe nacional de resultados. Recuperado de http://umc.minedu.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Libro_PISA.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2015). Rutas de aprendizaje. Comunicación V ciclo. Lima, Perú: Amauta Impresio
nes Comerciales.
Novak, J (1998). Conocimiento y aprendizaje. Los mapas conceptuales como herramientas facilitadoras para escuelas y empresas. Madrid, España: Alianza.
Pinzas, J. (2000). Guía de estrategias metacognitivas para desarrollar la comprensión lectora. Lima, Perú: Ministerio de Educación.
Sánchez, H y Reyes. (2006). Metodología y diseños de inves-tigación científicas. Lima, Perú: Visión universitaria.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Desafios

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a. Authors retain copyright to their published works, granting the journal the right of first publication.
b. Authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as rights to any process or procedure described in the article.
c. Authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform, and publicly communicate the article published in the journal (e.g., by placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the journal.
d. Authors retain the right to republish their work, to use the article or any part thereof (e.g., in a compilation of their work, conference notes, a thesis, or a book), provided they acknowledge the original source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, issue, and date).












